Sucker Punch Analysis: All the World’s a Stage

Sucker Punch Analysis Stage Zack SnyderEver since I saw Sucker Punch, I thought about it for 72 hours straight. Not because it’s anything particularly insightful, I just can’t see how a movie that looks this good can be so bad.

Like they say in Inception, “We need to go deeper.”
(Warning: Major spoilers ahead)

Even though it’s technically three films in one, there are two main ways to watch it: either the straightforward girl goes crazy and goes on an adventure, or as Zach Snyder describes in an interview for Film School Rejects, a critique on geek culture’s sexism.

I guess, being an otaku and seeing women fight in revealing outfits all the time, I never gave it much thought, but most people wondered for what purpose the girls were dressed that way in the fantasy world. “The girls are in a brothel performing for men in the dark. In the fantasy sequences, the men in the dark are us.” In other words, we become the audience, and the girls “perform” for us. The outfits that they wore were never intended to be sexual (Zach says there are never any zoom-ins on cleavage). The fantasy worlds (dragons, World War I, sci-fi) are all a reflection of our geeky souls.

After my 72 hours of critical thinking, I’ve come to the conclusion that the whole movie is a play. Right from the very beginning, the curtains open and “Sweet Dreams (Are Made of This)” starts playing; Zach says, “I want to let you know the music is not going to be of the time. It’s going to be transcendent and cross the bounds of space and time.” This is also to foreshadow the fantasy worlds (which break space and time) that come up later in the movie. The music plays a very big role in the movie. As I stated in my review, though songs like “I Want It All/We Will Rock You” were inappropriate for the time period, they gave the theatre this nice club ambiance; it made it feel as if we were the spectators and the silver screen was the stage. Could their sub-world possibly be our real world? It’s hard to say, since the movie takes place in the 1950s, but since the director does say the film transcends time and space, it’s possibly that it could travel to different realities too –– the asylum being their reality and the brothel being ours (metaphorically speaking, of course. Remember, that coincidentally in the sub-world the girls are performers).

As far as I can remember, the camera never goes into a first-person perspective, making sure that all the events take place from “our” point of view. When Baby Doll drifts into her fantasy, the camera doesn’t cut –– it swirls around her and the stage changes, imagine this being akin to a set change during a play. The original ending had Baby doll singing “O-o-h Child” on stage with the other dead girls joining her. The curtains close, and the movie ends, but this scene was cut out because it was too “culty, bizarro”. MANY scenes had to be cut, in order to keep the PG-13 rating, which is why the theatrical version didn’t come out/work out as his original vision.

Continuing with the World’s a Stage theme, when Sweet Pea pulls off her wig, and starts complaining during that scene right after Baby Doll is about to get lobotomized, it’s either another commentary on our geek culture (“I get the sexy school girl and nurse thing, but what’s this? A lobotomized vegetable? How about something more commercial?”) or a tongue-in-cheek self-aware reference (“This is a joke, right?” could possibly be her referring to the sudden scene shift and/or the sub-world brothel being “not real”).

I haven’t delved so far as to analyze each character’s archetype –– why the father slips into the role of the Father and why Blue, the asylum’s orderly, plays a mob boss (maybe because he is in charge of everything and he owns the girls?) –– but I’m sure they are in there somewhere. Also, why are there five girls? It must have some kind of important meaning since there is a “5” on the side of the helicopter, unless it’s something insipidly obvious like the connection to the five items

The most recognizable archetype is the Wise Man, which can also be an allusion to “follow the white rabbit (he will set you free).” This idea is not so far-fetched, because everywhere in the fantasy world there are rabbit logos (including the sword and mech he gives the girls). Even in the World War I era, the song that plays when all the girls meet the old (white-haired) man for the very first time is called “White Rabbit”. The six worlds (the real world, sub-world and four fantasy worlds) could represent the six brooks from Through the Looking-Glass, but maybe I’m just over-analyzing things. Now here’s something real trippy: there are four evil men (I don’t count the doctor since he was just doing his job); three of the girls get killed; there are two sisters, or rather two pairs of sisters; and one shared goal –– to escape.

I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again: I wish Zach Snyder would’ve stuck with the R-rating so the movie could’ve been closer to his original intention (I will be waiting for the Director’s Cut). Maybe then, critics would’ve taken him more seriously and not see Sucker Punch as some sort of cash cow aimed at anime and video game-obsessed teenage boys. He definitely has balls for going along with a movie that’s so different and not making something so commercial, so I will give him props for that. I love indie movies, and I view Sucker Punch as an indie movie with a huge budget. Like any indie movie, it’s multi-layered (both in story and in meaning); I believe every person will have their own interpretation, whether it’s escapism, empowerment, or just Alice and Wonderland on drugs.

I’m not defending the movie –– the sub-par acting and choppy pacing still makes this movie shit, and shit is still shit no matter how many cool slow-motion scenes you embellish it with –– I’m just giving it a different perspective.

So there you have it. Either Zach Snyder is the William Shakespeare of our time, or he is too philosophical for his and our own (according to the abysmal box office numbers) good.

“All the world’s a stage, and all the men and women merely players.”

About MkMiku

Just a neko expressing what's on my mind. Nya~
This entry was posted in 2011, Editorial, Movie Review and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

24 Responses to Sucker Punch Analysis: All the World’s a Stage

  1. Pingback: Sucker Punch [Movie Review] | Mind of Miku

  2. oballer says:

    I think the reason you hate it and the reason I like it is because we focused on two completely different parts of this movie.

    I chose to view it as I viewed “Pan’s Labyrinth.” A story about a girl living in a fucked up world who has to create fantasies in order to escape. The crazy ass action sequences were fun for me because instead of showing her dancing, they showed action, which made the film much more enjoyable.

    In my mind this was actually a very dark film, told in a very entertaining way. And I do like how you talked about the “world is a stage theme.”

    Also, I might add that I am gay… so the fact that there are a bunch of half naked girls does not make me like this film… I’m pretty sure that helped to get a few more ticket sales tho.

  3. MkMiku says:

    I didn’t even know this movie took place in a brothel when I went to go see it. I just wanted to watch it because it looked like a stylized anime (katanas and girls in sailor suits). I don’t think seeing half naked girls dancing would’ve made the movie better, but I would’ve preferred to have seen more of the brothel and asylum. Ironically, the movie felt too confined by only focusing on Baby Doll’s imaginary worlds, with little to no exposition regarding the real life people and places around her. From what I’ve read, though, it seems like a lot of important scenes had to be cut out and wasn’t the director’s own fault.

    I kinda viewed Sucker Punch as a Shutter Island meets Alice and Wonderland, and maybe that’s why it didn’t quite resonate with me, since, on the surface, it lacked the depth of either. Look a little farther, though, and there were a lot of symbols and themes, it just didn’t have the acting and script to match.

    Pan’s Labyrinth is one of my all-time favorites, btw. :D

  4. baka~ says:

    I think the movie never really began in a brothel but in that asylum. The brothel was a fictitious scenario that the Baby Doll created in order to escape the horrid reality that was happening in that institute. So from what I understood at the end of the movie: Asylum (real world) -> Brothel (escaping reality) -> MTV fights ( escaping the escapist reality – the mindfuck ). I think this only implies how grave the situation was in the institute for Baby Doll to go deep with her imagination. In reality, I even heard some mental patients being treated poorly by the doctors, cases being abuse, rape, etc. and this somehow was covered clean by the whole narrative of the movie, removing traces of that wicked reality by Baby Doll’s delusion =>

    • MkMiku says:

      I meant to say (most) of the movie took place in the brothel. Unfortunately, we only saw a few minutes of the asylum at most. Most people with delusions only immerse themselves into one fantasy world, so some f*cked up things must’ve really been going on for Baby Doll to have to resort to going into a fantasy world within a fantasy world.

  5. Anonymous says:

    Enjoyed reading/following your page.Please keep it coming. Cheers!

  6. Game_Over says:

    It hasn’t been mentioned here but many people are actively interpreting this movie as follows:

    Babydoll is real. She and Sweet Pea are the same person. They are not aware of this. Sweet Pea and Rocket are trauma induced alternate personas of Babydoll. They are personas she made while being sexually abused by her evil stepfather and dreamed of running away.

    When she is in the asylum, she is repeatedly sexually assaulted and therefore creates new personas to inject this pain into so her mind doesn’t completely shut down.

    Dr. Gorski teaches the girls in the asylum how to use their minds to disassociate from reality in order to deal with their painful realities. When Babydoll “dances” she is actually being molested/raped. She goes into the fight world in order to remove her mind from the dark realities happening around her.

    In the end, she willingly accepts the lobotomy in order to deprive the real world abuser, Blue, of what he wants so badly – a conscious willing being to dominate over.

    Her mind goes to a happy place when she is lobotomized and her Sweet Pea persona goes to Paradise…

    hope this helps.

    • MkMiku says:

      Thanks for the insight. Actually, I did read that interpretation somewhere, after I wrote this article. I just didn’t know it was the one most people were going by. The fact that she is being sexually assaulted (which is heavily hinted, though never shown) also explains why she never smiles when she dances.

      There is a conflicting argument to this alternate persona theory and that is that Sweet Pea is indeed a real person –– at least in the asylum, while in the brothel, Baby Doll could’ve just superimposed the girls into her mind

      Anyway, I won’t say I agree with this theory, but I’m not saying mine is right either. Like I’ve mentioned to so many others, I love how everyone has their own interpretation of the movie. ^^

  7. Pingback: Overthinking: Kore wa Zombie Desu ka? | Mind of Miku

  8. Pingback: Give it a 2nd Chance! | Mind of Miku

  9. max says:

    I think Game-over is right. I saw the movie yesterday, and didnt like it. The whole movie was ok, but the end is disgusting. I nearly puked, what a shitmovie

  10. Anonymous says:

    Thanks for a sucky ass review which absolutely doesn’t help me in anyway.

  11. Jack says:

    Sucker Punch like other movies before it inception, the matrix, alice in wonderland are all related to Monarch Programming. Educate yourselves. These movies have adverse effects on our subconcious and trust you me there are more to come.

    • MkMiku says:

      I actually enjoy many escapist movies like the ones you mentioned. But in the end, I remember it’s just a movie, in other words, nothing more than another form of entertainment.

  12. Anonymous says:

    I really liked the movie, I don’t like much action but because of the meaning of it, I did enjoy it. This movie is about taking control of your life, and Babydoll didn’t evade her reality, she just found a different way of coping with it.
    The girls are dressed like whores because they represent how women are perceived by most men, and how they are willing to accept that reality and use it in their favor.
    It does have bad acting, it does lack good lines, and it does leave many factors to interpretation. But I liked it, it has a very strong message. We humans are not entirely free, we are tied to our own mind and fears, but we do have the choice of using those fears for our benefit.

  13. Not Available says:

    Having s strong message does not make a film good. There is too much being thrown into the plot at once and very little time to understand it. Leaving things open to interpretation means nothing if there is no clear indication what it all means.

  14. Anonymous says:

    The author states that the camera never goes into the first-person perspective. But isn’t the camera in first-person at ‘So this is what we call the theater’?

  15. Pingback: Movie analysises | Zukonline

  16. \LaughingAtYourObsesion says:

    LMAO
    Why go into so much thought into something but call it shit at the end, if I don’t care about something I simply don’t think or intepret or justify it…

    I see a secret fan, just watch the movie, think about a couple of times and DEAL WITH YOU FEELINGS, think for yourself, Sin City is twice as fucked up and disgusting…

  17. Anonymous says:

    I’d just like to say, the technical ideas of the movie were probably not very substantial, but in respect, without focusing so much on these technical aspects and focusing more on the entertainment,I think you’ll find it is indeed a very entertaining movie.
    Also I would like to state that I have watched this movie five times and none of those times have I fully comprehended what was going on until now, yet even though this knowledge is incredibly rewarding even without this knowledge I would gladly watch again. So I ask you all to watch the movie,not for its camera angles and its’technical ideas’ rather the: Action, Thrill, Excitement and the emotion.
    P.s Sorry if I made grammatical errors I’m only 14, which you probably guessed after my perspective.
    All together great analysis. Also feedback would be appreciated.
    :D

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s